Truth is best digested S-L-O-W-L-Y. The internet culture of mass-consumption of what is called "truth", vis-à-vis the cut-and-paste mentality of proliferation is quickly producing a hyperbolic group acid reflux syndrome. After I posted my last major article, January 16, 2012, Gate Keepers and Handlers –Part 1, the Bill Wood saga commenced on the internet via Project Camelot.
We discussed some of the particulars on the live OPR show with Duncan O'Finioan and Miranda Kelly, but even as we were on the air, Project Camelot was doing another show where Wood appeared---and has now done yet another show with Wood (LiveStream-Saturday, February 4), for a total, so far, of roughly 9-10 hours of coverage. I don't think it is over any time soon...the drama is clearly too rich (and en-riching) to just stop. No one can accuse Kerry Cassidy of a lack of opportunism in milking every aspect of a story.
At this juncture, I want to leave the reader with some rather cryptic clues as to what is being played out. If you can "read between the lines", rather than being deflected by the sheer mass of the information being divulged, you will grasp where the "spin" lies in this entire saga of, not only Bill Wood/Brockbrader, but Camelot itself.
Connecting dots from a mere "factual" basis can be elusive, at best, or a preconceived path of distortion by design is scripting "new realities". It is also part of the modus operandi of any good intelligence operation to seed crucial information into the open view, while retaining plausible deniability by using encoded memes to signal the true intentions to the intitate. This seeding of memes serves the viral nature of the internet---and again, recall my closing arguments in the Gate Keepers and Handlers –Part 1 article:
"Were certain social experiments of the 1950s and 1960s, by intelligence agencies, a test run for a time when humanity could be targeted and voluntarily re-programmed to BELIEVE the unbelievable? Or to DISBELIVE the truth?"
Nearly instantaneous signalling, whether positive or negative, creates maximum effect. Do not believe that Project Camelot is not served by negative reactions---it is the negative which creates the critical updraft for such stories to oscillate through cyberspace. It is the perceptions of such disclosures that serve to build a significant movement to install larger and larger memes into the collective mindspace. At the collective level, these memes, or gestures result in the evolution of a culture, to borrow from Richard Dawkins' memetic theorem.
To understand the function of a Project Camelot in this memetic universe, it is useful to consider the stated intentions of Kerry Cassidy and Bill Ryan in their own words:
"Project Camelot is based on an idea generated when we first met and spent the weekend in Tintagel, England, overlooking the sea in the home of King Arthur. We named our project in tribute to the vision behind the utopian idea of the Round Table - and have structured all our efforts in this inspiring spirit."
With all its populist shaped statements about disclosures via "whistleblowers", which are aimed at informing and empowering its universe of media consumers, understand that the concept of a "round table" is NOT a populist concept, but rather an ELITIST concept in the Arthurian mythos. Nor, is the Arthurian legend "utopian", except in the most Orwellian sense. The roundtable concept, when stripped of the mythological lore, is, in fact, an elitist construct connected to Medevial warriors ruled by a monarchial structure---the concept that the "little people" required defenders and enlighteners.
The term "Pen Dragon" also is a Fennian (Ephraimite) form meaning, Pen "child(ren) of" Ap"Son of" combined with "Dargon" or "Dragon" the symbol of the Tuatha de Dannon (Danites) who were warriors that married the Irish widows, hence the Gaullo term Welch (Ue Lach) or "woman of a warrior."
As in all mythology, there is both a "light side" and "shadow side" to the mythos that needs to be acknowledged. Karl Gustav Jung wrote of this that:
“shadow is instinctive and irrational and thus is prone to projection onto others: turning a personal inferiority into a perceived moral deficiency in someone else.”
Truth is a personal quest---we can share our journey with others, but it is the process of integration with oneself that creates the field for enlightenment to occur. This cannot be accomplished en masse, as the promoters of a mass "ascension" have so painted. The expositors of "darkness" often employ the very same tactics as those involved with obfuscation, i.e.- the "global elites" and various intel agencies around the globe (which are, themselves, all connected to the overlords). Behind the curtain may lie cloaked agendas, intertwined intentions, and even more subtle deceptions, not even discerned by the operatives, themselves.
Gatekeepers and handlers generally think of themselves as these selfsame "lightbringers", while failing to deal with their own inner "shadows". Ulterior motives and allegiances can be masked behind the seemingly good-sounding motivations, but they will often reassert in the subtle manipualtions used by these same operatives:
"Learning to discern, cross-correlate and understand the complexities of right and wrong, who the good guys are etc is an intense discipline and takes years of experience, a level of detachment and discernment that few people are able to master at this time." -Kerry Cassidy, Kerry Cassidy Blog, defending Richard C. Hoagland's attacks on Gary Vierre while herself labelling Vierre as a "mind control subject"
The "few people" to which Ms. Cassidy refers as "masters", is very much the unmasking of her own "shadow". Her tactics and subliminal insertions into the very stories that she, herself, creates; her motivations in utilizing deft re-directs in interviews; and the usage of a group ("roundtable") treatment of her interview subjects (example: connecting Bill Wood/Brockbrader to David Wilcock) is the method of intense installation of memetics into a public consciousness where objective reporting melds with subjective motivations, i.e.- the evolution of a culture.
There are factions at work. There is more to this story. It is both subtle and apparent, IF one digs a bit. Truth is best digested S-L-O-W-L-Y. We will let the saga unfold and provide the backdrop at the appropriate time. Or---you, the readers may unravel it in your own manner if you are so disposed. You require no such gatekeepers.
from Kerry Cassidy's blog
It seems that "we" (royal we) are under-whelmed by the Brockbrader-a/k/a Bill Woods material? Ummm...I think we said that here.
February 5, 2012
Evaluating Whistleblower Testimony from Bill Brockbrader aka Bill Wood:
Thank you for all who took the time to listen and participate in the recent Livestream follow up interview with Bill Brockbrader. Unfortunately some of what was initially promised by Bill prior to the Livestream event was not delivered. If nothing else, what becomes evident is that what one person considers to be earth shattering or mind blowing can easily be seen as run of the mill to someone else. It all has to do with your frame of reference. In addition to that, as the interview progressed, what appeared to happen is that Bill Brockbrader had stretched his security oath as far as it would go. From that point on, it is evident that he is primarily talking from a personal/philosophical point of view.
It also became obvious, at least to me, that there was a lack of familiarity with what Project Camelot is all about. And therefore Bill and Eva are not able to assess accurately what is new and what is well known to the Camelot audience and so both he and Eva Moore, although well meaning, ended up discussing concepts and experiences that are already out in the public domain and therefore not at all novel or new. You be the judge.
Naturally, Bill's personal experiences seem unique to him. This is understandable. Unfortunately a lot of the material in this livestream had already been revealed in the first interview I did with him. The rest of the material with regard to the Las Vegas police department while interesting is hardly surprising. Actually it would be more surprising if they weren't run by the mob, on the take and corrupt as well as deeply involved in scandals of every kind... What you will see is that halfway through the interview I simply decided to take charge of the process and attempt to get some focus and answers to direct questions that some of the viewers had.
Suffice to say, whistleblower testimony is often full of distortions, blanks and unanswered questions due to the impact that mind control has had on the person's life. In this regard, Bill Brockbrader is no exception to this rule. I suggest that rather than judging him you consider the impact that simple mass mind control has had on your own lives and then try to put yourself in the shoes of someone who has that and on top of it joins the military and becomes the focus of intense mind manipulation over long periods of time. Then you will begin to understand what it truly means to be a whistleblower, or someone who has chosen to break ranks and come forward to tell the truth about what they have experienced.